Projected Winners went 4-1 on the season’s final day of action.
The only L was not a REAL surprise, being that it belonged to Baylor, the league’s most underachieving team in this—or almost any—season. In fact, based on their last twelve games, in which their 3-1 record dropped to 5-11, they probably belonged in the Third Tier with Iowa St, Tech, and Colorado. However, those three teams won only four games total against teams that were not their Tier peers: ISU beating NU and Baylor; and Tech beating KU and Baylor.
The Bears’ saving grace was three W’s vs. Tier Two Teams: at k-state and vs. Okie St and A&M.
In another oddity, KU went from experiencing the most embarrassing loss in Big 12 history Wednesday night (losing to a team it bettered by 11 games in the conference standings), to claiming the outright conference championship three days later in a gutsy second half performance vs. a focused UT team determined to give the program its first win ever in Allen Fieldhouse. Fortunately, they failed. Again.
For the season, the record of Projected Winners improved to 62-11, as UT, Okie St, NU and Mizzou all won at Home.
.
In the only at-risk game A&M won one for the Home team by taking out Mizzou. Home at-risk teams finished 7-16 for the season.
Projected Winners and at-risk Road teams were a combined 78-18.
FINAL STANDINGS: 3/7/09
The final 2009 standings, with each team’s pre-season projected record and ultimate difference in parentheses:
1. 14-2
KU (12.5-3.5) (+1.5)
2. 13-3
OU (12.5-3.5) (+.5)
3. 12-4
MU (7.5-8.5) (+4.5)
4. 9-7
A&M (7.5-8.5) (+1.5)
k-state (7-9) (+2)
OSU (7.5-8.5) (+1.5)
UT (11.5-4.5) (-2.5)
8. 8-8
NU (8.5-7.5) (-.5)
9. 5-11
Baylor (12-4) (-7)
10. 4-12
ISU (3.5-12.5) (+.5)
11. 3-13
Tech (2.5-3.5) (+.5)
12. 1-15
CU (3.5-12.5) (-2.5)
Now Y’all have a REAL good time until next January.
And this March.
. . .and April?
ROCK CHALK!
–Mark
Comments (0) * Have the Phog Blog come to you! * Subscribe to Comments